JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 23, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Luis Alberto Sandoval Navas

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Se confirma por cuanto demandante no corrigió en los términos indicados en el auto inadmisorio
  • Incumplimiento de requisitos mínimos para la admisión
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

El rechazo de la demanda se dio porque el actor no subsanó los defectos advertidos en el auto inadmisorio, relacionados con la falta de certeza, especificidad, pertinencia y suficiencia.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación considera que el escrito con el cual se presentó el recurso no aporta elementos aptos para superar los yerros advertidos por el Magistrado Sustanciador y por eso decide CONFIRMAR la providencia recurrida.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del 23 de abril de 2018, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Luis Alberto Sandoval Navas contra los artículos 20 (parcial), 60 (parcial) y 104 (parcial) de la Ley 100 de 1993, "por la cual se crea el sistema de seguridad social integral y se dictan otras disposiciones".
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR el contenido de esta decisión al recurrente, informándole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.